
Pardon my lateness in writing this.  Given the recent turn of exciting events, I hope it is forgivable.  One may ask: Why write this type of entries for every movie you watch?  I am a Cancer and I am fond of collecting movie stubs.  Until one day I realize that the printing on the movie stubs faints over time.  Besides, I don’t get to collect every movie stub since not every ticket is purchased by me.  Now, I have a record of all the movies I have watched on big screens.  And if you read my so-called ‘reviews’, more often than not, I mix it with my diary making it more personal, more fun for me to read in the future.  Interestingly, some do find some of my views beneficial, which I am humbled.  Some find a common voice within, which I am even more humbled.
I have high hope on Sir Arthur Ignatius Conan Doyle’s “Sherlock Holmes”. Â It is a classic, correct? Â I must confess that I didn’t know who wrote “Sherlock Holmes” and I am amongst the group of readers who thought that Sherlock Holmes exists. Â Between you and me, I even thought that “Sherlock Holmes” was written by Agatha Christie. Â Now you know that I am not quite into the genre of detective stories.
Or more correctly, reading detective stories make me feel stupid. Â Clues are supposed to be everywhere. Â And you are supposed to solve the crime as you read the story. Â Somehow, I am finding it hard to crack the cases. Â As the detective takes the final stage explaining the case, like a magician who leads you to the third stage, the answer is right in your face. Â And I always feel stupid, frustratingly inferior. Â To whom?
Back to the movie. Â Given any normal day release, “Sherlock Holmes” could well be an entertaining film to watch. Â But you know during Christmas, there were tons of great movies to choose from (blue aliens anyone?). Â We watched “Sherlock Holmes” on a large theater and the sound and image quality didn’t quite match the series of movies we have watched over the holiday season.
A couple of observations on “Sherlock Holmes”. Â The filmmakers appear to have borrowed Doyle’s characters with the story written by someone else. Â My questions are: Why not name these characters something else? Â Why not adapt one of the original stories written by Doyle? Â I suppose if the story is well known – though I have yet to read any of his books – many people would have known the ending. Â And that is not a great detective story because …Â ?
Our friend TK seems to enjoy watching “Sherlock Holmes”. Â Well, dude, if you want us to join you for “Sherlock Holmes 2”, you better join us for “Twilight 3”!